The 218th General Assembly (2008): Reflections part 5
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Reflections on the Form of Government taskforce proposal:
I listened to some of the testimony of the Form of Government taskforce members to the General Assembly committee responsible for bringing their proposal forward. There was a lot of conversation about the Taskforce’s intention in dropping out all the specific tasks for the work of the Committee on Ministry and the Committee on the Preparation for Ministry. The work of these committees, which is precisely delineated in the current Form of Government, is revised into broad categories and expectations in the proposed Form of Government. The theory behind this proposal is that each Presbytery should be empowered, given their particular context and ministry needs, to implement the broad expectations as necessary.
In explaining this point to the Assembly Committee, a member of the Form of Government taskforce told a story from his home, Grace Presbytery in Texas. His Presbytery, of course, has a huge number of Spanish speaking people, and their presbytery is trying in various ways to reach out to them. One of the ways the presbytery has done this is by building relationships with pastors and church leaders from the Presbyterian Church in Mexico. They have identified pastors from Mexico who may, with the help of our Grace Presbytery, come into America to serve with Spanish speaking congregations here. But there is a huge obstacle preventing these Mexican Presbyterian pastors from expressing full pastoral responsibilities within our Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). These pastors cannot be received as minister members of our church because they do not satisfy all the ordination requirements which are currently defined and listed in the Book of Order.
This particular situation raises a huge question for our church. Should Grace Presbytery, which is actively trying to reach out to the Spanish speaking people in their midst, be allowed to receive pastors from the Presbyterian Church of Mexico as Ministers of the Word and Sacrament in our church? Currently the moment a Minister of the Word and Sacrament in the Presbyterian Church of Mexico steps across the border into our church they cannot serve as a Minister of the Word and Sacrament because they have not satisfied all of our ordination requirements. Should Grace Presbytery, which needs these pastors from Mexico to support their ministry and mission to Spanish speaking people in Texas, be allowed and encouraged to receive these pastors as full and active members here? This is exactly the kind of flexibility in process and procedures which the Form of Government taskforce is proposing with their revised Form of Government.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In considering the opportunity of Grace Presbytery (indeed our entire denomination)to reach a broader and more diverse people in the name of Christ with the current limitations of clergy leadership, I'm reminded of the challenge our denomination faced earlier in our history. In that day, the church's ability to respond to the opportunities of expansion westward was also limited by "qualified" clergy.
ReplyDeleteYet, today as we consider a long-term resolution of this question (through the revision of the Form of Government), we can be thankful our BoO already welcomes and rejoices in the minsitry of Commissioned Lay Pastors.
Can't these gifted ministers from abroad be welcomed within the PCUSA fold as CLPs while our denomination sorts through this opprotunity? Goodness knows when the FoG revision might become a reality!
It would seem to me that such a solution (CLPs)in the short-term would permit ethnic communities to be served by the ministry of the PCUSA. Yet during this time, we must commit ourselves to a long-term resolution... whether through FoG's revision or more specific action.